- Lawyer banned for five years
- By Peter Gregory
- The Age
- 09/10/2008 Make a Comment
- Contributed by: The Rooster ( 264 articles in 2008 )
HIGH-PROFILE entertainment lawyer Michael Brereton has been banned from legal practice for at least five years over brazen misconduct in which he used clients' trust fund money as his own.
The ban — imposed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — also stops him from handling trust fund money until July 1, 2018.
Mr Brereton, 52, who was attending to business affairs in the United States when the tribunal last heard his case in August, has also been ordered to pay $145,000 legal costs.
If he is allowed to work again as a lawyer in Victoria, he must undertake professional development units in ethics, professional responsibility and practice management.
The penalties stem from tribunal findings that he was guilty of nine misconduct counts and three of unsatisfactory conduct.
VCAT deputy president Mark Dwyer and members Lillian Cooney and Fiona Harrison said the charges related to Mr Brereton mixing his interests with those of clients, and his handling of trust money.
They said allegations against Mr Brereton arose from a retirement village development, two offshore transactions between companies for which he acted and two loans concerning music promoter Michael Gudinski and Zinn Records.
In its judgement on August 13, the tribunal found Mr Brereton misappropriated more than $2.3 million of investors' money from the retirement village project.
The tribunal said it appeared the money came from Mr Brereton's trust account, and about half each went to entities associated with him, and with a business partner.
In a decision delivered yesterday, it said Mr Brereton's conduct was disgraceful and dishonourable, but was not necessarily equivalent to theft by intending to permanently deprive others.
"Brereton's misconduct rather reflected, to our mind, a brazen attitude that the trust monies were part of a common fund that could be borrowed or redirected to other of his business interests from time to time," the tribunal said.
"The findings in most instances reflect an intermingling of Brereton's business interests and his role as a lawyer … Brereton simply operated his trust account as a business account, with scant regard to his fiduciary obligations."
They said Mr Brereton's lack of remorse and insight about his wrongdoing was relevant to penalty considerations.
The ban — imposed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — also stops him from handling trust fund money until July 1, 2018.
Mr Brereton, 52, who was attending to business affairs in the United States when the tribunal last heard his case in August, has also been ordered to pay $145,000 legal costs.
If he is allowed to work again as a lawyer in Victoria, he must undertake professional development units in ethics, professional responsibility and practice management.
The penalties stem from tribunal findings that he was guilty of nine misconduct counts and three of unsatisfactory conduct.
VCAT deputy president Mark Dwyer and members Lillian Cooney and Fiona Harrison said the charges related to Mr Brereton mixing his interests with those of clients, and his handling of trust money.
They said allegations against Mr Brereton arose from a retirement village development, two offshore transactions between companies for which he acted and two loans concerning music promoter Michael Gudinski and Zinn Records.
In its judgement on August 13, the tribunal found Mr Brereton misappropriated more than $2.3 million of investors' money from the retirement village project.
The tribunal said it appeared the money came from Mr Brereton's trust account, and about half each went to entities associated with him, and with a business partner.
In a decision delivered yesterday, it said Mr Brereton's conduct was disgraceful and dishonourable, but was not necessarily equivalent to theft by intending to permanently deprive others.
"Brereton's misconduct rather reflected, to our mind, a brazen attitude that the trust monies were part of a common fund that could be borrowed or redirected to other of his business interests from time to time," the tribunal said.
"The findings in most instances reflect an intermingling of Brereton's business interests and his role as a lawyer … Brereton simply operated his trust account as a business account, with scant regard to his fiduciary obligations."
They said Mr Brereton's lack of remorse and insight about his wrongdoing was relevant to penalty considerations.
Source: https://www.theage.com.au/national/lawyer-banned-for-five-years-20081008-4wr6.html
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here