- 14-year-old boy 'seduces' Sharon Edwards, 40, UK court finds
- By Paul Sims, Daily Mail
- Daily Mail, UK
- 14/10/2008 Make a Comment
- Contributed by: The Rooster ( 264 articles in 2008 )
A MOTHER who had sex with a 14-year-old has walked free from court today after the judge said the boy seduced her.
The judge’s decision has triggered outrage Sharon Edwards, 40, bombarded the boy with as many as 50 text messages and emails a day, offered to buy him cocaine and regularly lured him into her bed.
Yet she walked free from court yesterday after Judge Peter Fox QC said the married housewife was an unhappy woman who was unable to resist the advances of a child.
“You had been a very unhappy lady for a very considerable period of time when this 14-year-old boy seduced you, and not you him, both so far as sexual matters and drugs are concerned,” he said.
Her eight-year marriage to a luxury car sales tycoon was falling apart, she felt trapped and lonely and was flattered by the attention the boy was paying her, Teesside Crown Court heard.
But last night the boy's mother attacked the judge's decision. She said: “He's still a child. If this had been a man he would almost certainly have been jailed but instead she gets to walk free and pick up her life.
“She still lives round here and can now do whatever she wants and go wherever she wants. It's outrageous. I can't believe what's happened.”
Edwards, a mother of two, admitted having sex with the boy on four separate occasions between September last year and January and yesterday was given a 12-month jail term, suspended for two years.
She also pleaded guilty to offering to supply the teenager a Class A drug.
The boy, who cannot be named, was a pupil at the same school her two sons attend when the relationship began.
They stayed in contact through text messages and emails and on one occasion Edwards took him to her sister's empty home for a night of sex.
But in January her suspicious husband, Mark, 43, discovered scores of emails she had sent to and received from the boy.
He confronted her at their home before contacting the youngster's mother.
Tina Dempster, prosecuting, said the boy later broke down in tears when his mother asked him if the allegations were true. She then called the police.
“He was crying,” said Miss Dempster.
“He told her he was sorry but he did not know how to stop it. He was extremely distressed, saying that his life was over and he might as well die now.
“The next day he was interviewed by the police and he confirmed that he had had a crush on her and that they had sexual intercourse the previous night.”
Miss Dempster said that Mr Edwards first became suspicious in October last year after discovering that his wife was sending and receiving up to 50 text messages a day from the same number.
Despite a blossoming property empire and a successful car sales business, their marriage was struggling to survive.
They had decided to make a go of it but by the end of October Mr Edwards was convinced his wife was having an affair. He confronted her about his suspicions but she denied it.
On January 18 he accessed his wife's MSN messaging programme and changed the settings so that all the sent messages would be saved.
“The next morning he checked the messages and he realised that the person with whom she was having a sexual relationship was the boy,” said Miss Dempster.
In one of the messages the boy asked her to buy some cocaine. She agreed and then said he would not need to pay her.
Deborah Sherwin, defending Edwards, said her client had pleaded guilty because she did not want her young victim to have to give evidence in court.
She added: “She was a sad and lonely housewife, she was not working, her parents had moved abroad, she was stuck at home, her marriage was failing and this boy paid her attention and she was flattered by it.”
Judge Fox QC described the case as “ exceptional” before telling Edwards he would not be sending her to jail because the boy had seduced her, and not the other way round. “Of course, you have responsibility as an adult to reject his advances in both regards,” he added.
Last night Claude Knights, director of children's charity Kidscape, said: “This sentence sets an awful precedent. The judge seems to be suggesting that in some way this is all down to the victim.
“But how on earth can he be regarded as responsible for what happened? He is just a child. He may look mature and he may even be sexually active but he is still a child and this is still abuse.”
Diana Sutton, head of policy at the NSPCC, said: “It is unacceptable to describe the child victim in this case as the seducer. This gives out completely the wrong message - that sex abuse is the fault of the child, when in reality it never is.”
Edwards was ordered to register as a sex offender for five years.
The judge’s decision has triggered outrage Sharon Edwards, 40, bombarded the boy with as many as 50 text messages and emails a day, offered to buy him cocaine and regularly lured him into her bed.
Yet she walked free from court yesterday after Judge Peter Fox QC said the married housewife was an unhappy woman who was unable to resist the advances of a child.
“You had been a very unhappy lady for a very considerable period of time when this 14-year-old boy seduced you, and not you him, both so far as sexual matters and drugs are concerned,” he said.
Her eight-year marriage to a luxury car sales tycoon was falling apart, she felt trapped and lonely and was flattered by the attention the boy was paying her, Teesside Crown Court heard.
But last night the boy's mother attacked the judge's decision. She said: “He's still a child. If this had been a man he would almost certainly have been jailed but instead she gets to walk free and pick up her life.
“She still lives round here and can now do whatever she wants and go wherever she wants. It's outrageous. I can't believe what's happened.”
Edwards, a mother of two, admitted having sex with the boy on four separate occasions between September last year and January and yesterday was given a 12-month jail term, suspended for two years.
She also pleaded guilty to offering to supply the teenager a Class A drug.
The boy, who cannot be named, was a pupil at the same school her two sons attend when the relationship began.
They stayed in contact through text messages and emails and on one occasion Edwards took him to her sister's empty home for a night of sex.
But in January her suspicious husband, Mark, 43, discovered scores of emails she had sent to and received from the boy.
He confronted her at their home before contacting the youngster's mother.
Tina Dempster, prosecuting, said the boy later broke down in tears when his mother asked him if the allegations were true. She then called the police.
“He was crying,” said Miss Dempster.
“He told her he was sorry but he did not know how to stop it. He was extremely distressed, saying that his life was over and he might as well die now.
“The next day he was interviewed by the police and he confirmed that he had had a crush on her and that they had sexual intercourse the previous night.”
Miss Dempster said that Mr Edwards first became suspicious in October last year after discovering that his wife was sending and receiving up to 50 text messages a day from the same number.
Despite a blossoming property empire and a successful car sales business, their marriage was struggling to survive.
They had decided to make a go of it but by the end of October Mr Edwards was convinced his wife was having an affair. He confronted her about his suspicions but she denied it.
On January 18 he accessed his wife's MSN messaging programme and changed the settings so that all the sent messages would be saved.
“The next morning he checked the messages and he realised that the person with whom she was having a sexual relationship was the boy,” said Miss Dempster.
In one of the messages the boy asked her to buy some cocaine. She agreed and then said he would not need to pay her.
Deborah Sherwin, defending Edwards, said her client had pleaded guilty because she did not want her young victim to have to give evidence in court.
She added: “She was a sad and lonely housewife, she was not working, her parents had moved abroad, she was stuck at home, her marriage was failing and this boy paid her attention and she was flattered by it.”
Judge Fox QC described the case as “ exceptional” before telling Edwards he would not be sending her to jail because the boy had seduced her, and not the other way round. “Of course, you have responsibility as an adult to reject his advances in both regards,” he added.
Last night Claude Knights, director of children's charity Kidscape, said: “This sentence sets an awful precedent. The judge seems to be suggesting that in some way this is all down to the victim.
“But how on earth can he be regarded as responsible for what happened? He is just a child. He may look mature and he may even be sexually active but he is still a child and this is still abuse.”
Diana Sutton, head of policy at the NSPCC, said: “It is unacceptable to describe the child victim in this case as the seducer. This gives out completely the wrong message - that sex abuse is the fault of the child, when in reality it never is.”
Edwards was ordered to register as a sex offender for five years.
Source: https://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24494848-663,00.html
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here