- Family law reform outcome not as expected
- By Prof Bryan Rodgers & Assoc Prof Bruce Smyth
- Australian National University
- 17/09/2013 Make a Comment
- Contributed by: JohnnyBgood ( 9 articles in 2013 )
Separated families in Australia are living with less parental conflict, an outcome likely to have been brought about by increased relationship services, not parenting time arrangements.
Changes to Australia’s family law in 2006 encouraged a shift towards shared-time, or tag-team, parenting, where a child spends equal or near-equal time with each parent.
However, ANU Associate Professor Bruce Smyth says new data, compiled from a random sample1 of separated parents from across Australia, suggests differently.
“Surprisingly, we found that since the family law changes, the prevalence of shared-time parenting in Australia has plateaued at about 15 per cent,” he says.
Smyth says Government commitment in 2006 to fund and support mediation services is likely to have been the cause of this parental shift, especially among high-conflict families.
“The introduction of family relationship centres2 seems to have offered new opportunities for courts and community-based services to work constructively together for the good of the children of separation and divorce,” he says.
“A cultural shift for the better appears to have occurred, moving away from lawyers and the courts as a default starting position for many separated parents, and moving towards the use of community-based family relationship support services.”
The research found that equal time arrangements were ordered by judges in less than 10 per cent of Family Court cases in the past five years.
“Shared-time arrangements can work well for some families, but badly for others,” joint author Professor Bryan Rodgers says.
“Rigid arrangements between warring shared-time parents are likely to have a negative impact on children.
“So, the expansion of family support services, allowing families access to good information, is likely to have helped steer some entrenched high-conflict families away from shared-time arrangements.”
Smyth and Rodgers are researchers at the Australian Demographic & Social Research Institute. They were part of a team of four ANU researchers who compiled the study.
2 FRC's - The article implies the introduction of Family Relationship Centres and mediation services have contributed positively to the family dispute resolution process.
In short since the 2006 Family Law Amendments, how many fathers, mothers, grandparents, relatives and children have experienced a more amicable resolution?
Changes to Australia’s family law in 2006 encouraged a shift towards shared-time, or tag-team, parenting, where a child spends equal or near-equal time with each parent.
However, ANU Associate Professor Bruce Smyth says new data, compiled from a random sample1 of separated parents from across Australia, suggests differently.
“Surprisingly, we found that since the family law changes, the prevalence of shared-time parenting in Australia has plateaued at about 15 per cent,” he says.
Smyth says Government commitment in 2006 to fund and support mediation services is likely to have been the cause of this parental shift, especially among high-conflict families.
“The introduction of family relationship centres2 seems to have offered new opportunities for courts and community-based services to work constructively together for the good of the children of separation and divorce,” he says.
“A cultural shift for the better appears to have occurred, moving away from lawyers and the courts as a default starting position for many separated parents, and moving towards the use of community-based family relationship support services.”
The research found that equal time arrangements were ordered by judges in less than 10 per cent of Family Court cases in the past five years.
“Shared-time arrangements can work well for some families, but badly for others,” joint author Professor Bryan Rodgers says.
“Rigid arrangements between warring shared-time parents are likely to have a negative impact on children.
“So, the expansion of family support services, allowing families access to good information, is likely to have helped steer some entrenched high-conflict families away from shared-time arrangements.”
Smyth and Rodgers are researchers at the Australian Demographic & Social Research Institute. They were part of a team of four ANU researchers who compiled the study.
Contributor's Remarks
1 Random Sample - Proper stats would specify what percentage from how many. This is vague and makes the following 15% useless and void as it is unable to be referenced. It's poor and sloppy work from trained academics on such an important issue as families and the effects from separation/divorce.2 FRC's - The article implies the introduction of Family Relationship Centres and mediation services have contributed positively to the family dispute resolution process.
In short since the 2006 Family Law Amendments, how many fathers, mothers, grandparents, relatives and children have experienced a more amicable resolution?
Source: https://news.anu.edu.au/2013/09/17/family-law-reform-outcome-not-as-expected/
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here