Previous article

News Articles

  • Queensland barrister Tony Morris QC loses appeal against $146 speeding fine
  • 23/06/2015 Make a Comment (3)
  • Contributed by: Vince ( 1 article in 2015 )
Tony Morris, QC, at a previous court hearing over his speeding fine.
Prominent Queensland barrister Tony Morris QC, who contested a $146 speeding fine on the basis he was not behind the wheel, has lost his appeal in the state's highest court.

Tony Morris QC was caught travelling at 57kph in a 50kph zone in Brisbane last year.

But in a highly publicised move, Mr Morris contested the infringement, arguing he should not be found liable because he was not driving at the time.

His legal challenge potentially would have helped countless Queensland motorists get out of speeding fines, but it was lost in the Court of Appeal today.

Mr Morris previously said the landmark legal battle was not about the money but rather the fairness of a law that made every Queensland motorist liable when their vehicle was used to commit an offence.

He challenged the validity of part of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995. [S.114]

It states if the person in charge is not the offending driver, criminal responsibility for the offending will be attributed to two individuals, although only one can be punished.

Mr Morris spent 90 minutes arguing his case during a hearing earlier this month.

During that hearing, the senior barrister representing the Queensland Police Service and the attorney-general argued there was nothing remarkable about the law and people in Mr Morris's situation could fill out a statutory declaration in their defence.

The Court of Appeal found there was no issue with the existing law as steps could be taken to identify the offending driver.

Mr Morris declined to comment on the decision.

View Attorney-General (Qld) v Morris & Anor [2015] QCA 112 judgment

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-23/queensland-barrister-tony-morris-qc-loses-speeding-fine-appeal/6566238

    By:Dean from Qld, Australia on July 26, 2015 @ 5:22 pm
    So we are still responsible if we are not driving our car, can prove we are somewhere else and receive a speed fine or my car is involved in some accident? Is the judicial system ran by imbeciles or very intelligent people with prime access to our bank accounts? Is it the responsibility of the owner to investigate who took the car without his-her consent or is it the duty of the police to do their job instead of working as traffic wardens?
    By:Michael from Vic, Au on June 28, 2015 @ 9:00 pm
    s 107 Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 states "Owner responsible for offence". Charge sheet specifies OWNER as offender + liable, despite whether owner was in charge at alleged place + time or not. [sighting this on 2 recent court hearing notices]. What law best deals with this unfair tripe?
    By:vince from qld, aust on June 23, 2015 @ 11:37 pm
    The Queen's Counsel said "the current law meant the registered owner of a vehicle was personally liable whenever the vehicle was used to commit an offence."...totally agree it's all crap

 0+0= 
(Note: If wrong - comments will not be posted)
Footnotes:

1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large

To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here

To contribute a news article Click Here

To view or contribute a Quote Click Here

Hosting & Support by WebPal© 2025 f4joz.com All rights reserved.