- Water Harvesting - Murray / Darling River Basin
- By Gary J Matthews
- 25/12/2019 Make a Comment
- Contributed by: Bill ( 5 articles in 2019 )
HERE IS YOUR CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
THIS IS CALLED WATER HARVESTING EVERYONE.
THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH THE MURRAY/DARLING RIVER BASIN...
The Governamt uses TAXPAYERS MONEY (OUR MONEY) to help build gigantic dams to store much needed water by normal farmers downstream which in turn stops the flow of the rivers, kills off all the Fish and wildlife to Large Agricultural Corporations so they can inturn on sell the water at massive profits for the International investors.
At least 20 to 30 large private dams have been constructed in the Murray-Darling basin in recent few years by stealth behind our backs.
While information on the number of private dams and the cost of their taxpayer subsidy is limited, the report says “it appears that just two of these private dams cost taxpayers nearly $30 million alone”.
“Over $200 million was spent on dam-related projects [in the Murray-Darling Basin] according to official data, although not all of this will have been specifically spent on dams,” it says,
Maryanne Slattery, senior water researcher at the institute, said politicians don’t want to talk about these dams because “they do nothing for drought-stricken communities, the health of the river or struggling farmers”.
“These dams have been built on private land and are for the exclusive use of corporate agribusiness, such as Webster Limited,” she said.
“Politicians are reluctant to talk about why millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent subsidising dams that make the problems of the Murray Darling Basin worse”.
But private dams involved “minimal public consultation and can be approved and constructed based on environmental assessments commissioned from private consultants by dam proponents”.
The report looked at three dams in detail, on properties in the Murrumbidgee Valley owned by Webster Ltd – Glenmea, Bringagee and Kooba Station. The dams were funded out of the federal government’s $4 billion water efficiency program.
The report argues such dams are not the best way to save water. It points to the department of agriculture and water resources saying new dams can save water where they replace shallower ones (which have more evaporation), or where they collect recycled irrigation water.
“However, none of the three case-study dams in this report save water in this way. They are new dams, not replacing smaller, shallower dams. Water stored behind their approximately eight metre high walls would otherwise be stored in public headwater dams around 100 metres deep.”
These dams are designed to divert normal irrigation water and “supplementary water” – not to simply recycle irrigation water, the report says. Thus “they increase both evaporation and irrigation water use”.
Supplementary water is water that is surplus to consumptive needs. It is important environmentally and to downstream users, historically making up almost all the water flowing from the Murrumbidgee into the Murray, the report says.
“With major dams now targeting this water, the Murrumbidgee could be disconnected from the Murray in most years. This has implications for all NSW Basin water users, who are already grappling with how to meet downstream obligations within the Murray’s constraints and with no water coming down the Darling.”
The report says a Canadian pension fund had just been reported as “swooping” on Webster, “with specific mention of a property with one of these new dams”.
“The new dams that Australian taxpayers helped build appear to be highly valued by international investors,”
THIS IS CALLED WATER HARVESTING EVERYONE.
THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH THE MURRAY/DARLING RIVER BASIN...
The Governamt uses TAXPAYERS MONEY (OUR MONEY) to help build gigantic dams to store much needed water by normal farmers downstream which in turn stops the flow of the rivers, kills off all the Fish and wildlife to Large Agricultural Corporations so they can inturn on sell the water at massive profits for the International investors.
At least 20 to 30 large private dams have been constructed in the Murray-Darling basin in recent few years by stealth behind our backs.
While information on the number of private dams and the cost of their taxpayer subsidy is limited, the report says “it appears that just two of these private dams cost taxpayers nearly $30 million alone”.
“Over $200 million was spent on dam-related projects [in the Murray-Darling Basin] according to official data, although not all of this will have been specifically spent on dams,” it says,
Maryanne Slattery, senior water researcher at the institute, said politicians don’t want to talk about these dams because “they do nothing for drought-stricken communities, the health of the river or struggling farmers”.
“These dams have been built on private land and are for the exclusive use of corporate agribusiness, such as Webster Limited,” she said.
“Politicians are reluctant to talk about why millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent subsidising dams that make the problems of the Murray Darling Basin worse”.
But private dams involved “minimal public consultation and can be approved and constructed based on environmental assessments commissioned from private consultants by dam proponents”.
The report looked at three dams in detail, on properties in the Murrumbidgee Valley owned by Webster Ltd – Glenmea, Bringagee and Kooba Station. The dams were funded out of the federal government’s $4 billion water efficiency program.
The report argues such dams are not the best way to save water. It points to the department of agriculture and water resources saying new dams can save water where they replace shallower ones (which have more evaporation), or where they collect recycled irrigation water.
“However, none of the three case-study dams in this report save water in this way. They are new dams, not replacing smaller, shallower dams. Water stored behind their approximately eight metre high walls would otherwise be stored in public headwater dams around 100 metres deep.”
These dams are designed to divert normal irrigation water and “supplementary water” – not to simply recycle irrigation water, the report says. Thus “they increase both evaporation and irrigation water use”.
Supplementary water is water that is surplus to consumptive needs. It is important environmentally and to downstream users, historically making up almost all the water flowing from the Murrumbidgee into the Murray, the report says.
“With major dams now targeting this water, the Murrumbidgee could be disconnected from the Murray in most years. This has implications for all NSW Basin water users, who are already grappling with how to meet downstream obligations within the Murray’s constraints and with no water coming down the Darling.”
The report says a Canadian pension fund had just been reported as “swooping” on Webster, “with specific mention of a property with one of these new dams”.
“The new dams that Australian taxpayers helped build appear to be highly valued by international investors,”
Source: https://www.facebook.com/Astroboy2001/posts/10220100628006721
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here